All your business in one place.

Kerovento is a private, internal web application that uses SAP Business One as its cornerstone and connects to other databases and systems, presenting the consolidated result to management as live dashboards and reporting.

K Kerovento Halverton Industries, Inc. Jun 2026 ▾ Synced 06:12
Monthly operating review Actual vs budget · $ · ERP + GL, reconciled
Net revenue
7,142,000
▲ 192,000 · 2.8%
Gross margin
26.2%
▲ 0.3 pts · plan 26.0%
EBITDA
1,215,000
▲ 60,000 · 5.2%
Net income
489,440
▲ 39,520 · 8.8%
Cash at 30 Jun
2,320,240
▼ 1,091,760 since 31 Dec
Income statement · June 2026
LINE ACTUAL BUDGET VAR $ VAR % Net revenue 7,142,000 6,950,000 ▲ 192,000 2.8% Cost of goods sold 5,268,000 5,145,000 ▲ 123,000 2.4% Gross profit 1,874,000 1,805,000 ▲ 69,000 3.8% Selling, general & administrative 921,000 905,000 ▲ 16,000 1.8% Research & technical 104,000 105,000 ▼ (1,000) (1.0)% Operating income 849,000 795,000 ▲ 54,000 6.8% Depreciation & amortisation 366,000 360,000 ▲ 6,000 1.7% EBITDA 1,215,000 1,155,000 ▲ 60,000 5.2% Interest expense 191,000 193,000 ▼ (2,000) (1.0)% Other income / (expense) (14,000) (10,000) ▼ (4,000) (40.0)% Income tax expense 154,560 142,080 ▲ 12,480 8.8% Net income 489,440 449,920 ▲ 39,520 8.8%
Cost lines are stated positive; a variance on a cost line is favourable when negative.
Variance to budget by line · $ 000
Net revenue +192 Cost of goods sold +123 SG&A +16 Research & technical −1 D&A +6 EBITDA +60
Working capital · days
Days sales outstanding62.0 Days inventory on hand89.5 Days payable outstanding60.0 Cash conversion cycle91.5
Covenants · TTM at 30 Jun
Senior leverage1.82×PASS Fixed charge coverage1.31×PASS Capex limit used81.5%WATCH
K Kerovento Halverton Industries, Inc. Jun 2026 ▾ Synced 06:12
Monthly operating review Actual vs budget · $ · ERP + GL, reconciled
Net revenue
7,142,000
▲ 192,000 · 2.8%
Gross margin
26.2%
▲ 0.3 pts · plan 26.0%
EBITDA
1,215,000
▲ 60,000 · 5.2%
Net income
489,440
▲ 39,520 · 8.8%
Cash at 30 Jun
2,320,240
▼ 1,091,760 since 31 Dec
Income statement · June 2026
LINE ACTUAL BUDGET VAR $ VAR % Net revenue 7,142,000 6,950,000 ▲ 192,000 2.8% Cost of goods sold 5,268,000 5,145,000 ▲ 123,000 2.4% Gross profit 1,874,000 1,805,000 ▲ 69,000 3.8% Selling, general & administrative 921,000 905,000 ▲ 16,000 1.8% Research & technical 104,000 105,000 ▼ (1,000) (1.0)% Operating income 849,000 795,000 ▲ 54,000 6.8% Depreciation & amortisation 366,000 360,000 ▲ 6,000 1.7% EBITDA 1,215,000 1,155,000 ▲ 60,000 5.2% Interest expense 191,000 193,000 ▼ (2,000) (1.0)% Other income / (expense) (14,000) (10,000) ▼ (4,000) (40.0)% Income tax expense 154,560 142,080 ▲ 12,480 8.8% Net income 489,440 449,920 ▲ 39,520 8.8%
Cost lines are stated positive; a variance on a cost line is favourable when negative.
Variance to budget by line · $ 000
Net revenue +192 Cost of goods sold +123 SG&A +16 Research & technical −1 D&A +6 EBITDA +60
Working capital · days
Days sales outstanding62.0 Days inventory on hand89.5 Days payable outstanding60.0 Cash conversion cycle91.5
Covenants · TTM at 30 Jun
Senior leverage1.82×PASS Fixed charge coverage1.31×PASS Capex limit used81.5%WATCH
EBITDA · June 2026
1,215,000
▲ 60,000 · 5.2% vs budget
EBITDA · June 2026
1,215,000
▲ 60,000 · 5.2% vs budget

Finance dashboard. Figures are synthetic.

The problem

The month ends. The numbers arrive two weeks later.

Most mid-market manufacturers run on a stack that was never designed to talk to itself. The ERP holds production and orders. The ledger holds the financials. Payroll sits somewhere else again. The machines hold the truth about what actually ran.

So every month, someone exports all of it and stitches it together by hand. The board pack takes days. The bank covenant package takes longer and nobody is quite sure it will tie. By the time the numbers are ready, the month they describe is over.

Late.

Decisions get made on last month's picture, or on instinct.

Manual.

The close, the board pack, and the bank package are rebuilt from scratch every cycle.

Fragile.

Every hand-off between spreadsheets is a place the number can break.

The platform

Three layers, one system.

Kerovento is organized the way a business actually runs — a daily pulse, a monthly depth, and the tools that feed them.

Cockpits — the daily pulse

Fast, operational views built to be read in seconds, not studied. Operations shows production output, the order book, and machine status. Sales shows bookings, weeks of cover, and past-due. Finance and Treasury show cash position, AR and AP, and daily margin.

K Kerovento Plant 1 · Halverton Mfg ▾ Live · 30 Jun 2026, 14:22
Output · June, tonnes
3,842
▲ 82 vs plan 3,760
OEE
71.4%
▼ 3.8 pts vs target 75.2%
On-time delivery
93.8%
▼ 1.2 pts vs target 95.0%
Unplanned downtime · hrs
186
▲ 46 vs plan 140
Line status · 30 June 2026, 14:22
LINE STATUS UTILISATION JOB NOTE Line 1● Running 91% 4471 Line 2● Running 87% 4468 Line 3◐ Changeover 62% 4482Scheduled, 90 minutes Line 4● Running 94% 4475 Line 5■ Down 0% Drive fault · maintenance attending Line 6○ Idle 0% No scheduled work this shift
OEE components
Availability84.2% Performance89.6% Quality94.6%
Quality & safety
Scrap rate3.1% ▲ 0.6 Changeovers214 Recordables YTD2 Days since recordable47
Machine hours
Run4,118 Plan4,200 Variance▼ (82)
Order book
Open order value18,420,000 Released to production9,860,000 Past due1,240,000 Past due share6.7% Average weekly shipments1,374,000 Weeks of cover13.4
Shift log
13:48 · Line 5 stopped — drive fault raised to maintenance 12:05 · Job 4482 changeover started on Line 3 09:20 · Scrap on Job 4468 above tolerance, 1.4 t quarantined 06:00 · Shift A start · 6 operators, 5 lines scheduled
K Kerovento Plant 1 · Halverton Mfg ▾ Live · 30 Jun 2026, 14:22
Output · June, tonnes
3,842
▲ 82 vs plan 3,760
OEE
71.4%
▼ 3.8 pts vs target 75.2%
On-time delivery
93.8%
▼ 1.2 pts vs target 95.0%
Unplanned downtime · hrs
186
▲ 46 vs plan 140
Line status · 30 June 2026, 14:22
LINE STATUS UTILISATION JOB NOTE Line 1● Running 91% 4471 Line 2● Running 87% 4468 Line 3◐ Changeover 62% 4482Scheduled, 90 minutes Line 4● Running 94% 4475 Line 5■ Down 0% Drive fault · maintenance attending Line 6○ Idle 0% No scheduled work this shift
OEE components
Availability84.2% Performance89.6% Quality94.6%
Quality & safety
Scrap rate3.1% ▲ 0.6 Changeovers214 Recordables YTD2 Days since recordable47
Machine hours
Run4,118 Plan4,200 Variance▼ (82)
Order book
Open order value18,420,000 Released to production9,860,000 Past due1,240,000 Past due share6.7% Average weekly shipments1,374,000 Weeks of cover13.4
Shift log
13:48 · Line 5 stopped — drive fault raised to maintenance 12:05 · Job 4482 changeover started on Line 3 09:20 · Scrap on Job 4468 above tolerance, 1.4 t quarantined 06:00 · Shift A start · 6 operators, 5 lines scheduled
Line status · Plant 1
Line 4● Running94% Line 5■ Down0% Line 6○ Idle0%
Line status · Plant 1
Line 4● Running94% Line 5■ Down0% Line 6○ Idle0%

Operations cockpit. Figures are synthetic.

Dashboards — the monthly depth

Where analysis happens, per function.

  • Finance — P&L, Balance Sheet, and a full ASC-230 Cash Flow statement. Margin and ROIC. Working capital with AR and AP aging. Cost centers. Close review. Bank covenants.
  • Sales — performance against plan, by customer and segment, order book, pricing.
  • Operations — an eight-pillar operating board: Safety, Asset and OEE, Quality, Delivery, Cost, Capital, People, and a CEO focus layer that turns the board into a decision list.
  • Corporate Objectives — the handful of numbers leadership is actually measured on — revenue, EBITDA, margin, ROIC, cash conversion — each one drillable to the detail beneath it.
K Kerovento
Income statement · YTD
Net revenue41,280,000 Cost of goods sold30,547,000 Gross profit10,733,000 Operating expenses6,032,000 EBITDA6,881,000 Net income2,640,240
EBITDA · YTD Jun 2026 By entity Halverton Manufacturing Close
6,881,000 ▲ 101,000 · 1.5% vs budget Source: general ledger, four entities, eliminations applied 1 Jul 06:12
Level 2 · by entity
Halverton Manufacturing4,610,000 17.1% Halverton Coatings1,720,000 15.4% Halverton International745,000 13.8% Holding(145,000) Eliminations(49,000) Group6,881,000 16.7%
Level 3 · Halverton Manufacturing
Net revenue26,940,000 Cost of goods sold19,980,000 Gross profit6,960,000 Operating expenses3,770,000 Operating income (EBIT)3,190,000 Add back: depreciation & amortisation1,420,000 EBITDA4,610,000 EBITDA margin17.1% Headcount214
Intercompany sales to Halverton Coatings of 2,250,000 are removed in eliminations, with 49,000 of margin held in inventory.
K Kerovento
Income statement · YTD
Net revenue41,280,000 Cost of goods sold30,547,000 Gross profit10,733,000 Operating expenses6,032,000 EBITDA6,881,000 Net income2,640,240
EBITDA · YTD Jun 2026 By entity Halverton Manufacturing Close
6,881,000 ▲ 101,000 · 1.5% vs budget Source: general ledger, four entities, eliminations applied 1 Jul 06:12
Level 2 · by entity
Halverton Manufacturing4,610,000 17.1% Halverton Coatings1,720,000 15.4% Halverton International745,000 13.8% Holding(145,000) Eliminations(49,000) Group6,881,000 16.7%
Level 3 · Halverton Manufacturing
Net revenue26,940,000 Cost of goods sold19,980,000 Gross profit6,960,000 Operating expenses3,770,000 Operating income (EBIT)3,190,000 Add back: depreciation & amortisation1,420,000 EBITDA4,610,000 EBITDA margin17.1% Headcount214
Intercompany sales to Halverton Coatings of 2,250,000 are removed in eliminations, with 49,000 of margin held in inventory.
EBITDA · June 2026
1,215,000
▲ 60,000 · 5.2% vs budget
EBITDA · June 2026
1,215,000
▲ 60,000 · 5.2% vs budget

Drill-down from a headline figure to its detail. Figures are synthetic.

Tools — planning and input

Sales Forecast. Production Scheduling. A Pricing Lookup that puts realized price against cost and contribution margin, and compares it across your own book — so a price with no standard behind it still has something to be measured against. A Month-End Pacer. And an Input Center for the data that doesn't live in any system yet.

K Kerovento H1 2026 ▾ All product lines ▾
Pricing lookup Six months to 30 June 2026 · $ per tonne · ties to the income statement
Realised price · weighted
1,802.62
Derived from revenue and volume
Standard cost · weighted
1,333.93
Includes absorbed fixed overhead
Contribution margin
741.08
41.1% of realised price
Volume · six months
22,900 t
Revenue 41,280,000
By product line
PRODUCT LINE VOL t REVENUE PRICE STD COST VAR COST CM $/t CM % VS PY Coated film 4,20011,130,0002,650.001,855.001,409.801,240.2046.8%▲ 4.0% Laminate 5,10010,455,0002,050.001,517.001,198.43851.5741.5%▲ 2.8% Slit tape 6,4009,472,0001,480.001,124.80922.34557.6637.7%▲ 1.2% Industrial sheet 4,9006,478,0001,322.041,070.18909.65412.3931.2%▲ 1.6% Custom converting 9002,835,0003,150.001,953.001,328.041,821.9657.8%▲ 4.3% Contract manufacturing 1,400910,000650.00585.00514.80135.2020.8%▼ (2.7)% Total / weighted average 22,900 41,280,000 1,802.62 1,333.93 1,061.54 741.08 41.1%
Contribution margin is realised price less variable cost. Standard cost carries absorbed fixed overhead, so contribution margin is wider than gross margin — the two are not interchangeable.
Price movement vs prior year
Coated film 4.0% +102 $/t Custom converting 4.3% +130 $/t Laminate 2.8% +55 $/t Industrial sheet 1.6% +21 $/t Slit tape 1.2% +18 $/t Contract manufacturing (2.7)% (18) $/t
Internal comparison against last year's realised price, at line level only — the workbook holds no weighted prior-year price, so no total movement is shown. Not peer benchmarking; no peer data exists in this set.
Customer concentration · YTD
Vernholt Packaging Group7,018,00017.0% Merrowfield Automotive5,372,00013.0% Aldervane Medical3,684,0008.9% Bramwick Appliance2,891,0007.0% All other customers22,315,00054.1% Top four18,965,00045.9%
K Kerovento H1 2026 ▾ All product lines ▾
Pricing lookup Six months to 30 June 2026 · $ per tonne · ties to the income statement
Realised price · weighted
1,802.62
Derived from revenue and volume
Standard cost · weighted
1,333.93
Includes absorbed fixed overhead
Contribution margin
741.08
41.1% of realised price
Volume · six months
22,900 t
Revenue 41,280,000
By product line
PRODUCT LINE VOL t REVENUE PRICE STD COST VAR COST CM $/t CM % VS PY Coated film 4,20011,130,0002,650.001,855.001,409.801,240.2046.8%▲ 4.0% Laminate 5,10010,455,0002,050.001,517.001,198.43851.5741.5%▲ 2.8% Slit tape 6,4009,472,0001,480.001,124.80922.34557.6637.7%▲ 1.2% Industrial sheet 4,9006,478,0001,322.041,070.18909.65412.3931.2%▲ 1.6% Custom converting 9002,835,0003,150.001,953.001,328.041,821.9657.8%▲ 4.3% Contract manufacturing 1,400910,000650.00585.00514.80135.2020.8%▼ (2.7)% Total / weighted average 22,900 41,280,000 1,802.62 1,333.93 1,061.54 741.08 41.1%
Contribution margin is realised price less variable cost. Standard cost carries absorbed fixed overhead, so contribution margin is wider than gross margin — the two are not interchangeable.
Price movement vs prior year
Coated film 4.0% +102 $/t Custom converting 4.3% +130 $/t Laminate 2.8% +55 $/t Industrial sheet 1.6% +21 $/t Slit tape 1.2% +18 $/t Contract manufacturing (2.7)% (18) $/t
Internal comparison against last year's realised price, at line level only — the workbook holds no weighted prior-year price, so no total movement is shown. Not peer benchmarking; no peer data exists in this set.
Customer concentration · YTD
Vernholt Packaging Group7,018,00017.0% Merrowfield Automotive5,372,00013.0% Aldervane Medical3,684,0008.9% Bramwick Appliance2,891,0007.0% All other customers22,315,00054.1% Top four18,965,00045.9%

Pricing lookup. Figures are synthetic.

Standout features

Three things a BI tool won't do for you.

The bank pack that builds itself

Kerovento generates the quarterly bank covenant package — FCCR, senior-debt leverage, the EBITDA bridge — directly from live financials, and validates it against the lender's own requirements. The quarterly scramble becomes a review instead of a rebuild.

Financials that tie

A full P&L, Balance Sheet, and gross ASC-230 Cash Flow statement — operating, investing, and financing — reconciled to the source ledger. Close review and standard-cost integrity checks run alongside, catching mispostings before they reach the statements rather than after.

Consolidation, both pictures

Roll up multiple operating companies and a holding entity into consolidated views. The audited group picture and the operating picture, side by side, without a spreadsheet in between.

K Kerovento Q2 2026 ▾ Send to lender
Compliance certificate — quarter ended 30 June 2026
Trailing twelve months · Halverton Industries, Inc. · Credit agreement dated 14 March 2024
Generated 1 Jul 2026, 06:12 Export PDF
Senior debt / TTM EBITDA PASS
1.82×
Maximum 3.00× · headroom 1.18×
Fixed charge coverage PASS
1.31×
Minimum 1.20× · headroom 0.11×
Capital expenditure, TTM WATCH
4,075,000
Limit 5,000,000 · 81.5% used · 925,000 remaining
TTM EBITDA build · senior debt
EBITDA · six months to 30 Jun 266,881,000 EBITDA · six months to 31 Dec 256,420,000 TTM EBITDA13,301,000 Revolving credit facility3,900,000 Current portion of long-term debt3,000,000 Long-term debt, less current portion17,250,000 Total senior debt24,150,000
Fixed charge coverage · computation
TTM EBITDA13,301,000 Less capital expenditure(4,075,000) Less cash taxes paid(1,414,000) Less distributions(850,000) Cash available for fixed charges6,962,000 Interest expense2,310,000 Scheduled principal payments3,000,000 Total fixed charges5,310,000 Ratio1.31×
EBITDA bridge · TTM Jun 25 to TTM Jun 26 · $ 000
TTM Jun 2512,410 Volume and mix+1,060 Price+780 Material cost(615) Conversion+425 Labour and burden(390) SG&A(245) Other(124) TTM Jun 2613,301
K Kerovento Q2 2026 ▾ Send to lender
Compliance certificate — quarter ended 30 June 2026
Trailing twelve months · Halverton Industries, Inc. · Credit agreement dated 14 March 2024
Generated 1 Jul 2026, 06:12 Export PDF
Senior debt / TTM EBITDA PASS
1.82×
Maximum 3.00× · headroom 1.18×
Fixed charge coverage PASS
1.31×
Minimum 1.20× · headroom 0.11×
Capital expenditure, TTM WATCH
4,075,000
Limit 5,000,000 · 81.5% used · 925,000 remaining
TTM EBITDA build · senior debt
EBITDA · six months to 30 Jun 266,881,000 EBITDA · six months to 31 Dec 256,420,000 TTM EBITDA13,301,000 Revolving credit facility3,900,000 Current portion of long-term debt3,000,000 Long-term debt, less current portion17,250,000 Total senior debt24,150,000
Fixed charge coverage · computation
TTM EBITDA13,301,000 Less capital expenditure(4,075,000) Less cash taxes paid(1,414,000) Less distributions(850,000) Cash available for fixed charges6,962,000 Interest expense2,310,000 Scheduled principal payments3,000,000 Total fixed charges5,310,000 Ratio1.31×
EBITDA bridge · TTM Jun 25 to TTM Jun 26 · $ 000
TTM Jun 2512,410 Volume and mix+1,060 Price+780 Material cost(615) Conversion+425 Labour and burden(390) SG&A(245) Other(124) TTM Jun 2613,301
EBITDA · June 2026
1,215,000
▲ 60,000 · 5.2% vs budget
EBITDA · June 2026
1,215,000
▲ 60,000 · 5.2% vs budget

Bank covenant package. Figures are synthetic.

Integrations

It reads the systems you already run.

Kerovento connects directly to your existing stack. Real-time integration through a resilient mirror with fallback — not nightly CSV exports.

SAP Business One (HANA) QuickBooks Online iSolved Production-floor machine capture

Connectors are built to a common interface, so additional systems can be added without disturbing what already works.

Alternatives

You have three other options. Here's how they compare.

vs. generic BI — Power BI, Tableau

A blank canvas you have to build, and then maintain forever. Kerovento arrives opinionated and manufacturing-native, with finance-grade statements that tie and covenant automation that BI tools simply don't attempt.

vs. your ERP's built-in reporting

ERPs report transactions. Kerovento turns transactions into management decisions — across every system you run, not just the ERP, with consolidation and board packs on top.

vs. a controller and a spreadsheet

It doesn't replace judgment. It removes the assembly. The numbers are always current, always reconciled, and always one click from their source.

Built for you

Configured to your business, not to an average one.

Kerovento is not a one-size-fits-all app you adapt to. Every instance is configured to your chart of accounts, your legal entities, your cost centers, your thresholds, and your systems. Your partner does that configuration during implementation — without custom code, which is why a tailored deployment takes days rather than quarters.

Role-based access throughout, with a publish gate so leadership approves the numbers before they circulate.

Case study

Supastrip runs on Kerovento.

Supastrip is a mid-market manufacturer running several operating entities. Its data lived where most manufacturers' data lives: SAP Business One for production and orders, QuickBooks Online for the ledger, iSolved for payroll, and the machines on the floor keeping their own record.

Kerovento reads all four. Leadership opens a cockpit in the morning instead of waiting for a monthly export. The financial statements reconcile to the source ledger. The quarterly bank covenant package generates from live numbers instead of being assembled by hand.

The quarterly covenant package used to take our controller most of a week to build and reconcile by hand. Now it comes off the financials and ties out to the bank's own workpaper, so I review it instead of assembling it. I've stopped asking where we stand — I just open the page.

Matias Campiani, CEO, Supastrip
Partners

Delivered by partners who know your business.

Kerovento is sold, implemented, and supported by authorized partners. They handle the relationship, configure the platform to your operation, and provide your first line of support. We build and maintain the technology behind them.

Interested in reselling Kerovento? Become a partner

Get in touch

See it against your own numbers.

Tell us a little about your operation and we'll connect you with the right Kerovento partner.

No account to create, no software to download. A partner will be in touch.

What happens to the information you send is described in our privacy notice.